In the middle of our idyllic existence, suddenly, apocalypse
struck. Quite literary. Pipe in washing machine broke causing flood no. 1, pipe
under the sink also broke causing flood no. 2 – ironically, since we’ve just
seen Noah.
Some architectural
genius put crappy plastic pipe from the sink, straight into the tailed wall,
making it impossible to replace, without some major drilling,
hammering and all the other plumbing/constructing things.
As if that wasn’t enough, our supply of gas just ended. In
India gas pipes are pretty much nonexistent. One has to go through painful
application process in order to get gas cylinder, which is then connected to
the stove. With all my kitchen toys, we managed to survive on one cylinder
since we moved here, but now the time came for a replacement. Apparently to get
one, we need some gas company booklet, which, of course, we misplaced months
ago. Looks like Universe has a nasty sense of humor today. Ok, Universe, I hear
you, loud and clear! Happy April fool’s day to you too!
As for Noah, I needed some time to decide that I didn’t like
it after all. I read some reviews beforehand, but the negative ones were solely
concentrated around the differences between the movie and the bible. That didn’t
bother me at all… considering the length of the written story that was to be
expected. Besides, Arnofsky isn’t exactly known for Christian epics and heartwarming
family stories.
Throughout the entire show I had one overwhelming thought: He had way too many ideas for this movie! If I
could take it apart and look at certain motifs and subplots separately, there
is a lot of interesting material there. But the final product is a, rather
random, mixture of them all.
There were quite a few moments I did enjoy, mostly the
visual parabolas and comparisons; plus Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins were
splendid as always. It’s the inconsistencies that bug me. The stone
transformers and magic beans, childish take on veganism and some reptilian hyenas…
what was it all for? Plus, it seems like Noah really had it for the mankind.
Respect nature, cherish all life, all is well till the man come along. Then it’s
back to good old Russell with his anger management issues.
The interesting part was vision of the flood as ultimate
mass murder, and the big question: how is it just? Not to mention the fact that
god, as such, is present only by omission. It makes you half wander: was it all
just a figment of derange mind? Placing the story above time and suggesting its
repetitive nature were also engaging.
I would enjoy a deeper exploration of one or two motifs, but
in the present form, the movie is quite schizophrenic. And not in a good way.
No comments:
Post a Comment